Skip to main content

REVIEW: Detailed design anchors confident Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? at Canadian Stage

int(111521)
Production photo from Who's Afraid of Virignia Woolf? at Canadian Stage. iPhoto caption: Photo by Dahlia Katz.
/By / Jan 28, 2025
SHARE

For much of Canadian Stage’s new production of Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, the beloved drama by Edward Albee, a curtain’s bottom-left corner ripples in the wind. As bottles smash, vomit erupts, and books hurl into walls, this piece of white fabric billows on, the wind unaltered by the war of egos ravaging the surrounding New England parlour. It’s an affecting detail in a high-profile production flush with thoughtful design choices. Tasked for the second time in a year with filling the titanic canvas of the Bluma Appel Theatre, director Brendan Healy opts for hundreds of little strokes over a single massive one.

Home from a university faculty party stumble married couple George (Paul Gross) and Martha (Martha Burns), a matter-of-fact assistant history professor and the cunning daughter of the school’s president, respectively. Drunk, they argue about a line from a Bette Davis flick on their centre-stage couch, which faces upstage. But when younger couple Honey (Hailey Gillis) and Nick (Ryan Wilkie) arrive for fun and games, a turntable rotates and the furniture opens itself up to the audience.

As the rest of the play unfolds — Albee’s after-hours plot mostly consists of drinking, flirting, manipulating, and screaming — that turntable doesn’t get a ton more usage. But Healy enriches the visual world of Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? in other ways. Although Julie Fox’s set and costume design evoke the play’s 1960s setting, traces of the surreal poke through. The house’s walls tell a whole story, each side of the open-faced rectangle carrying a different texture: upstage is smudged floral wallpaper, stage right are beige wood planks, and stage left is highly reflective metal. As George, Martha, and Nick wrestle for control, these towering panels pull in distinct aesthetic directions, forming a triangle of their own.

Gross and Burns are married in real life, but this isn’t The Notebook: The Musical. George and Martha spend most of the runtime psychologically torturing each other — while these people need each other deeply, that fact doesn’t assert itself until the play’s final moments, when dawn rises over the party’s carnage. It’s only a romance if you really squint.

As they verbally brawl, Burns’ Martha is the more dynamic of the two, presenting a surface of borderline babyish innocence (“I want a big sloppy kiss!”) before bounding at her prey without reserve. The opening night audience cheered in encouragement as she did jazz kicks down an upstage flight of stairs after changing into tight gold pants.

Gross’ George almost feels like a bitter former hockey player, his scruffy exterior (and boxy, jersey-like cardigan) doing little to shroud his flat excretions of machismo. In most cases, I don’t really notice actors’ ages not matching the script, but Gross being 19 years older than the character’s original age of 46 changes things: While Martha’s jabs at George’s less-than-mountainous status within the university usually seem a bit silly, given that he still has the prime of his academic career ahead of him, they’re rather more brutal aimed at someone nearing retirement.

In a pre-show speech, Healy explained that Mac Fyfe, who was originally cast as Nick, was out of Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? due to medical issues; on opening night, Wilkie, his replacement, had been with the show for just five days, and performed with a period-accurate script in hand (particularly understandable because the show runs three-and-a-half hours including two intermissions). His precise text work and uptight physicality managed to keep the four-hander scenes afloat, but the play’s pair of lengthy scenes between Nick and George dragged, and left the particulars of that relationship muddy. 

And while Honey gets the least to do (she spends most of the play blacked out in the bathroom), Gillis gets to explode into a couple ecstatic outbursts of joy that recall her exuberant Nina in Soulpepper Theatre’s 2023 production of The Seagull.

Perhaps oddly for a one-room drama, however, the performances aren’t the most memorable thing about this solid, but not transcendent, production. That’s still the hulking set, which seems almost to have a pulse — the floor spinning under our prizefighters’ feet, the wall shining like a funhouse mirror. It’s a foreboding arena I began to doubt George and Martha would ever leave.


Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? runs at Canadian Stage until February 16. Tickets are available here.


Intermission reviews are independent and unrelated to Intermission’s partnered content. Learn more about Intermission’s partnership model here.

Liam Donovan
WRITTEN BY

Liam Donovan

Liam is Intermission’s senior editor. He lives in Toronto.

LEARN MORE

Comments

  • Les Wallace Feb 1, 2025

    I saw the show yesterday night. Paul Gross was spectacular !.
    One of the finest performances I have ever seen.

  • Constance Beresford-Howe Jan 30, 2025

    I left during the first intermission. The actors were brilliant. The set was cleverly done. The script is unbearable.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


/
Jane Spidell in 'Twelve Dinners.' iPhoto caption: Jane Spidell in 'Twelve Dinners.' Photo by Dahlia Katz.

REVIEW: Family tensions run high in TIFT’s intimate Twelve Dinners

In the now-closed Twelve Dinners, an autobiographical play written and directed by Steve Ross, audiences received intimate access to an unvarnished version of a younger Ross through 12 evening meals with his parents.

By Phillip Dwight Morgan
Members of the company of 'Narnia.' iPhoto caption: Members of the company of 'Narnia.' Photo by Dahlia Katz.

REVIEW: Bad Hats’ Narnia is a joyful, heartwarming escape

The spirit of openness and the joy of discovery rule over this Narnia. Open the wardrobe and see.

By Ilana Lucas
Members of the company of 'Robin Hood.' iPhoto caption: Members of the company of 'Robin Hood.' Photo by Dahlia Katz.

REVIEW: Canadian Stage’s Robin Hood panto is anti-capitalist fun for the whole family

Following Ross Petty’s legacy of scene-stealing, Damien Atkins as the evil Prince John is easily the greatest delight of the show.

By Gus Lederman
Lauren Gillis and Alaine Hutton in 'Public Consumption.' iPhoto caption: Lauren Gillis and Alaine Hutton in 'Public Consumption.' Photo by Eden Graham.

REVIEW: Lester Trips’ stylish Public Consumption captures the internet’s profound emptiness

Rather than directly representing online life, Public Consumption speculates — with virtuosity — about how the digital world affects our bodies. And the show's findings are by no means comfortable.

By Liam Donovan
Tony Ofori and Daren A. Herbert in 'Moonlight Schooner.' iPhoto caption: Tony Ofori and Daren A. Herbert in 'Moonlight Schooner.' Photo by Dahlia Katz.

REVIEW: Necessary Angel’s Moonlight Schooner offers a poetic glimpse into the lives of three Caribbean sailors

Kanika Ambrose’s Moonlight Schooner is animated and visually stunning, but its individual pieces don’t come together as neatly as I would've expected.

By Abi Akinlade
iPhoto caption: Fiona Mongillo in 'Reproduktion.' Photo by Ann Baggley.

REVIEW: Here For Now’s well-acted Reproduktion attempts to tackle too much

Amy Rutherford’s world premiere script is ambitious and the material it covers is complex — but the narrative feels disjointed.

By Charlotte Lilley