Skip to main content

REVIEW: Detailed design anchors confident Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? at Canadian Stage

Production photo from Who's Afraid of Virignia Woolf? at Canadian Stage. iPhoto caption: Photo by Dahlia Katz.
/By / Jan 28, 2025
SHARE

For much of Canadian Stage’s new production of Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, the beloved drama by Edward Albee, a curtain’s bottom-left corner ripples in the wind. As bottles smash, vomit erupts, and books hurl into walls, this piece of white fabric billows on, the wind unaltered by the war of egos ravaging the surrounding New England parlour. It’s an affecting detail in a high-profile production flush with thoughtful design choices. Tasked for the second time in a year with filling the titanic canvas of the Bluma Appel Theatre, director Brendan Healy opts for hundreds of little strokes over a single massive one.

Home from a university faculty party stumble married couple George (Paul Gross) and Martha (Martha Burns), a matter-of-fact assistant history professor and the cunning daughter of the school’s president, respectively. Drunk, they argue about a line from a Bette Davis flick on their centre-stage couch, which faces upstage. But when younger couple Honey (Hailey Gillis) and Nick (Ryan Wilkie) arrive for fun and games, a turntable rotates and the furniture opens itself up to the audience.

As the rest of the play unfolds — Albee’s after-hours plot mostly consists of drinking, flirting, manipulating, and screaming — that turntable doesn’t get a ton more usage. But Healy enriches the visual world of Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? in other ways. Although Julie Fox’s set and costume design evoke the play’s 1960s setting, traces of the surreal poke through. The house’s walls tell a whole story, each side of the open-faced rectangle carrying a different texture: upstage is smudged floral wallpaper, stage right are beige wood planks, and stage left is highly reflective metal. As George, Martha, and Nick wrestle for control, these towering panels pull in distinct aesthetic directions, forming a triangle of their own.

Gross and Burns are married in real life, but this isn’t The Notebook: The Musical. George and Martha spend most of the runtime psychologically torturing each other — while these people need each other deeply, that fact doesn’t assert itself until the play’s final moments, when dawn rises over the party’s carnage. It’s only a romance if you really squint.

As they verbally brawl, Burns’ Martha is the more dynamic of the two, presenting a surface of borderline babyish innocence (“I want a big sloppy kiss!”) before bounding at her prey without reserve. The opening night audience cheered in encouragement as she did jazz kicks down an upstage flight of stairs after changing into tight gold pants.

Gross’ George almost feels like a bitter former hockey player, his scruffy exterior (and boxy, jersey-like cardigan) doing little to shroud his flat excretions of machismo. In most cases, I don’t really notice actors’ ages not matching the script, but Gross being 19 years older than the character’s original age of 46 changes things: While Martha’s jabs at George’s less-than-mountainous status within the university usually seem a bit silly, given that he still has the prime of his academic career ahead of him, they’re rather more brutal aimed at someone nearing retirement.

In a pre-show speech, Healy explained that Mac Fyfe, who was originally cast as Nick, was out of Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? due to medical issues; on opening night, Wilkie, his replacement, had been with the show for just five days, and performed with a period-accurate script in hand (particularly understandable because the show runs three-and-a-half hours including two intermissions). His precise text work and uptight physicality managed to keep the four-hander scenes afloat, but the play’s pair of lengthy scenes between Nick and George dragged, and left the particulars of that relationship muddy. 

And while Honey gets the least to do (she spends most of the play blacked out in the bathroom), Gillis gets to explode into a couple ecstatic outbursts of joy that recall her exuberant Nina in Soulpepper Theatre’s 2023 production of The Seagull.

Perhaps oddly for a one-room drama, however, the performances aren’t the most memorable thing about this solid, but not transcendent, production. That’s still the hulking set, which seems almost to have a pulse — the floor spinning under our prizefighters’ feet, the wall shining like a funhouse mirror. It’s a foreboding arena I began to doubt George and Martha would ever leave.


Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? runs at Canadian Stage until February 16. Tickets are available here.


Intermission reviews are independent and unrelated to Intermission’s partnered content. Learn more about Intermission’s partnership model here.

Liam Donovan
WRITTEN BY

Liam Donovan

Liam is Intermission’s senior editor. He lives in Toronto.

LEARN MORE

Comments

  • Les Wallace Feb 1, 2025

    I saw the show yesterday night. Paul Gross was spectacular !.
    One of the finest performances I have ever seen.

  • Constance Beresford-Howe Jan 30, 2025

    I left during the first intermission. The actors were brilliant. The set was cleverly done. The script is unbearable.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


iPhoto caption: Athena So, Mike Nadajewski, Taylor Garwood, and Ben Page in rehearsal for 'All the Cows Are Dead.' Photo by Dahlia Katz.

What I discovered at rehearsals for TIFT’s world premiere musical All the Cows Are Dead

I’m sure most new musicals have interesting rehearsal processes — but it helped my excitement level that All the Cows Are Dead is a site-specific, existential two-hander from one of Ontario’s most risk-taking companies. There'll also be countless balloons.

By Liam Donovan
L to R, top to bottom: 'The 39 Steps' (photo by Raph Nogal), 'Benevolence' (photo by Jae Yang), 'The Born-Again Crow' (photo by Jeremy Mimnagh), 'Dimanche' (photo by Thomas Müller), 'Last Landscape' (photo by Fran Chudnoff), 'The Merchant of Venice' (photo by Kyle Purcell), 'Slave Play' (photo by Dahlia Katz), 'Waiting for Godot' (photo by Elana Emer), 'The Welkin' (photo by Dahlia Katz). iPhoto caption: L to R, top to bottom: 'The 39 Steps' (photo by Raph Nogal), 'Benevolence' (photo by Jae Yang), 'The Born-Again Crow' (photo by Jeremy Mimnagh), 'Dimanche' (photo by Thomas Müller), 'Last Landscape' (photo by Fran Chudnoff), 'The Merchant of Venice' (photo by Kyle Purcell), 'Slave Play' (photo by Dahlia Katz), 'Waiting for Godot' (photo by Elana Emer), 'The Welkin' (photo by Dahlia Katz).

Twelve indelible moments of performance from 2025

With the lights fading on another year of fleeting thrills in dark rooms, we asked 12 Ontario performing arts writers to reflect on a moment that stayed with them. The results mainly stem from Toronto theatre productions, but there are a few surprises weaved in.

Connor Mitton and members of the company of 'Sex Dalmatian’s Hot Holiday Spectacular.' Photo by Jeremy Mimnagh. iPhoto caption: Connor Mitton and members of the company of 'Sex Dalmatian’s Hot Holiday Spectacular.' Photo by Jeremy Mimnagh.

REVIEW: Sex Dalmatian’s Hot Holiday Spectacular is a peppermint-coated acid trip

Rock Bottom Movement’s surrealist mandate is on full display in this 15-dancer fantasia, which begins with an invitation to let go: “The only thing you need to know is not to know anything at all,” pronounces the Mayor of Sex Dalmatian, the evening’s narrator and the mayor of the titular canine’s mind.

By Liam Donovan
Tom Rooney in 'Rogers v. Rogers' at Crow's Theatre. iPhoto caption: Tom Rooney in 'Rogers v. Rogers' at Crow's Theatre. Photo by Dahlia Katz.

REVIEW: Tom Rooney dazzles in world premiere of Michael Healey’s Rogers v. Rogers

Rooney and Healey skewer the Rogers family with a disarmingly relaxed virtuosity that the surrounding Crow's Theatre production sometimes supports, and sometimes lets down.

By Liam Donovan
Lauren Gillis and Alaine Hutton in 'Public Consumption.' iPhoto caption: Lauren Gillis and Alaine Hutton in 'Public Consumption.' Photo by Eden Graham.

REVIEW: Lester Trips’ stylish Public Consumption captures the internet’s profound emptiness

Rather than directly representing online life, Public Consumption speculates — with virtuosity — about how the digital world affects our bodies. And the show's findings are by no means comfortable.

By Liam Donovan
'dna' production photo iPhoto caption: Photo by Elana Emer.

REVIEW: Icarus Theatre’s DNA paints a disturbing mural of teenage rebellion

While director Erik Richards’ tendency toward snappy, thriller-esque pacing doesn’t suit all of DNA’s more intimate moments, it adds electricity to the drama’s group scenes, bringing playwright Dennis Kelly’s reflections on groupthink and collective grief into clear view.

By Liam Donovan