Skip to main content

REVIEW: Obsidian and Tarragon co-production reflects on the inadequacy of language

int(113806)
Dwain Murphy and Virgilia Griffith in 'a profoundly affectionate, passionate devotion to someone (-noun).' iPhoto caption: Dwain Murphy and Virgilia Griffith in 'a profoundly affectionate, passionate devotion to someone (-noun).' Photo by Jae Yang.
/By / Nov 24, 2025
SHARE

a profoundly affectionate, passionate devotion to someone (-noun): the title says it all, offering a definition for an absent word. The thing is the thing unsaid. 

Written by debbie tucker green and directed by Mumbi Tindyebwa Otu, in a co-production between Obsidian Theatre and Tarragon Theatre, profoundly runs on an engine of insufficient expression. “I wanted you beyond sentence in between syllables above vowels under consonants and after punctuation” the character B confesses. For the play’s three couples, language falls short: beautifully, tragically, sublimely.

You can do a lot of different things with words. For 90 minutes, A (Virgilia Griffith), B (Dwain Murphy), Woman (Warona Setshwaelo), Man (Andrew Moodie), and Young Woman (Jasmine Case) try many of them: begging and demanding and boasting and flirting and loving and demeaning. They don’t get what they want. They get what they want and regret it. They want to know how to be known by their partner and how to know them in return. They lament the silences accruing.

Silence sits at the heart of this story, which is told in three parts, each dedicated to a different couple. Beginning with a witty relationship postmortem, the plot takes a turn into grief, illness, and withdrawal. Wives lose their capacity to speak and husbands grow frustrated by the demand they fill the gap. As each scene navigates the chasm between acts and declarations of love, a gendered pattern emerges. While profoundly’s themes of love and language are partly universal, their nuances are weighted by the historically gendered dynamics of domesticity and desirability.

It’s important to note, as well, the political significance of green’s approach to language as a Black British playwright writing for Black actors. Her stylistic use of South London vernacular undercuts systems of literary adjudication that demand a narrow adherence to Standard English. green’s characteristically rhythmic dialogue rolls between speakers, a fast-paced repartee with the occasional pointed break. Thoughts may be unfinished, advances rejected, husbands checked out — but speech in this play is emotionally affective and musically striking. I was immediately hooked on her poetics.

In this North American premiere, all five actors deliver lucid performances that are also a credit to Otu’s direction. The production catches subtle gradations in green’s language, bringing to life exchanges that appear unwieldy and disorienting on the page. Even without the use of British accents, the script’s humor and wordplay sing. Griffith and Murphy, whose characters A and B occupy the plot’s centre, are particularly transcendent in their complicated portrayals of love lost.

These nameless characters exist nowhere in particular. Set design by Jawon Kang and lighting by Raha Javanfar craft a dynamic environment in the Tarragon Mainspace that responds to continuous shifts in intimacy. Underlit platforms assembled into abstract shapes offer a playing space that begins with a homey golden glow and somehow transforms into the shards of a disjointed home — and then back again. A mural featuring smudged, silhouetted figures looms in the background like a spectre of memory. At one point while watching Part One, I became aware of how small A and B suddenly looked against what felt like monumental ruins. In Part Two, the same set evokes an average kitchen flooded in sunlight. 

Like the contours of its set, the structure of this three-part show is charmingly uneven. The first part has 15 scenes. Parts Two and Three are one scene each. And why not? Although told in atemporal flashes, transitions from scene to scene are always fluid, aided by evocative blue lighting. The brevity of the last two parts felt like shockwaves from the earthquake that ends Part One, a dramaturgical experiment reimagining the shape of plot structure.  

Granted, that plot is fragmentary at best, although pieces come together surprisingly in the end. There’s no conclusion, in a traditional sense, although the third part wraps up with a pithy “Thass all.” The narrative simply trails off, like a tired voice.


a profoundly affectionate, passionate devotion to someone (-noun) runs at Tarragon until December 7. More information is available here.


Intermission reviews are independent and unrelated to Intermission’s partnered content. Learn more about Intermission’s partnership model here.

Ferron Delcy
WRITTEN BY

Ferron Delcy

Ferron Delcy is pursuing her PhD in early modern literature at the University of Toronto. In 2024, Ferron participated in the New Young Reviewers program facilitated by Toronto Fringe and Intermission. She is a big fan of ghost stories, fog machines, and weird metaphors.

LEARN MORE

Comments

  • Mark Edwards Nov 26, 2025

    Well written review to a well written and performed play. Nice.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


/
Jane Spidell in 'Twelve Dinners.' iPhoto caption: Jane Spidell in 'Twelve Dinners.' Photo by Dahlia Katz.

REVIEW: Family tensions run high in TIFT’s intimate Twelve Dinners

In the now-closed Twelve Dinners, an autobiographical play written and directed by Steve Ross, audiences received intimate access to an unvarnished version of a younger Ross through 12 evening meals with his parents.

By Phillip Dwight Morgan
Members of the company of 'Narnia.' iPhoto caption: Members of the company of 'Narnia.' Photo by Dahlia Katz.

REVIEW: Bad Hats’ Narnia is a joyful, heartwarming escape

The spirit of openness and the joy of discovery rule over this Narnia. Open the wardrobe and see.

By Ilana Lucas
Members of the company of 'Robin Hood.' iPhoto caption: Members of the company of 'Robin Hood.' Photo by Dahlia Katz.

REVIEW: Canadian Stage’s Robin Hood panto is anti-capitalist fun for the whole family

Following Ross Petty’s legacy of scene-stealing, Damien Atkins as the evil Prince John is easily the greatest delight of the show.

By Gus Lederman
Lauren Gillis and Alaine Hutton in 'Public Consumption.' iPhoto caption: Lauren Gillis and Alaine Hutton in 'Public Consumption.' Photo by Eden Graham.

REVIEW: Lester Trips’ stylish Public Consumption captures the internet’s profound emptiness

Rather than directly representing online life, Public Consumption speculates — with virtuosity — about how the digital world affects our bodies. And the show's findings are by no means comfortable.

By Liam Donovan
Tony Ofori and Daren A. Herbert in 'Moonlight Schooner.' iPhoto caption: Tony Ofori and Daren A. Herbert in 'Moonlight Schooner.' Photo by Dahlia Katz.

REVIEW: Necessary Angel’s Moonlight Schooner offers a poetic glimpse into the lives of three Caribbean sailors

Kanika Ambrose’s Moonlight Schooner is animated and visually stunning, but its individual pieces don’t come together as neatly as I would've expected.

By Abi Akinlade
iPhoto caption: Fiona Mongillo in 'Reproduktion.' Photo by Ann Baggley.

REVIEW: Here For Now’s well-acted Reproduktion attempts to tackle too much

Amy Rutherford’s world premiere script is ambitious and the material it covers is complex — but the narrative feels disjointed.

By Charlotte Lilley